| 1 |
On 06/06/2012 08:28 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 04:19:58PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 3 |
>> # Samuli Suominen<ssuominen@g.o> (06 Jun 2012) |
| 4 |
>> # Vulnerable and no longer used by anything in tree wrt #403415 |
| 5 |
>> # Removal in 30 days |
| 6 |
>> <net-libs/xulrunner-10.0 |
| 7 |
>> <gnome-extra/yelp-2.30.2-r200 |
| 8 |
> What do we do about other apps that are XULRunner based, and NOT yet |
| 9 |
> updated by upstream to the new xulrunner (it actually depends on remote |
| 10 |
> XUL loading that got removed in newer versions too). |
| 11 |
> (In my case, http://open-ils.org/) |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
we don't do anything, but you can keep on using it by copying the ebuild |
| 15 |
to your local overlay (don't forget distfiles) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
then when they do upgrade to new xulrunner, it's possible to package it |
| 19 |
from firefox tarball |
| 20 |
mozilla upstream doesn't support this, but some other distribs are |
| 21 |
packaging it[1] |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
[1] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/xulrunner/ |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
but nothing in portage is requiring this, so -1 for packaging it from |
| 26 |
me, as they should really upgrade to something else, like webkit-gtk... |
Archives