Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: What do you think about removing gtk-1.2 theme engines from tree?
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 10:24:40
Message-Id: pan.2007.03.04.10.21.32@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: What do you think about removing gtk-1.2 theme engines from tree? by Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
1 "Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy" <pclouds@×××××.com> posted
2 fcaeb9bf0703030635j6be68a2dh309bcc1b0120666a@××××××××××.com, excerpted
3 below, on Sat, 03 Mar 2007 21:35:16 +0700:
4
5 > On 2/27/07, Andrej Kacian <ticho@g.o> wrote:
6 >>
7 >> Because it's much more convenient to just go "emerge theme" instead of
8 >> googling up the upstream website, finding the link to download,
9 >> download it, unpack and figure out how to install.
10 >
11 > Me too. Should we create a theme overlay (officially) and move non-code
12 > themes there?
13
14 Now that's IMO a very useful idea! =8^) I too find themes available in
15 portage useful, but equally don't necessarily believe they belong in the
16 main tree. An overlay seems to me to be the perfect solution.
17
18 --
19 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
20 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
21 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
22
23 --
24 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies