| 1 |
Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 08:16, Martin Lesser wrote: |
| 4 |
> > I try to create an ebuild for ghfaxviewer and have some problems |
| 5 |
> > with an absolute path (/usr/share/pixmaps) in the Makefile which result |
| 6 |
> > in 'access violation' errors. |
| 7 |
> *Sigh* In such cases you need to patch (or sed -ie) the makefile so |
| 8 |
> that it installs to ${D}/usr/share/pixmaps. Please make a note of this |
| 9 |
> change when you submit the ebuild to bugs.gentoo.org so that we can |
| 10 |
> contact the program developers and ask them to fix that glitch. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
The hint given by Alastair did it mostly. Two additional variables in |
| 13 |
src_install() did the rest. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Before reporting this ebuild to bugs.gentoo.org I would like to know how |
| 16 |
long the "normal" period is between reporting a new ebuild and finding |
| 17 |
this ebuild in the portage tree (or getting any other response)- another |
| 18 |
ebuild was added on 05/31/03 |
| 19 |
(http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22000) but since then not much |
| 20 |
happened... |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
IMO creating or reporting ebuilds which perhaps are only helpful here |
| 23 |
doesn't make much sense. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Martin |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives