| 1 |
Craig Callender wrote: |
| 2 |
> I'm currently working on a Gnome Frontend for Portage (currently named |
| 3 |
> GnoPortage *grin*). Working on it is still at the primitive level, I'm |
| 4 |
> designing the interface right now and how it will get package info, etc... |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> In order to minimize re-coding (I have all summer to do this, then I will |
| 7 |
> be back in school, so I would prefer to only work on bugs and not |
| 8 |
> features) I was curious where I could get some info about Portage 2. I |
| 9 |
> figure we will be there soon, considering we are at 1.9.x something right |
| 10 |
> now. Also, if there is a Gnome developer out there I would love to get |
| 11 |
> their feedback on my GUI design to see if they like/dis-like it, or have |
| 12 |
> suggestions. Thanks. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Hm reminds me of what i did a while ago, i made a basic portage tree |
| 16 |
browser in Python. I put the latest incarnation here |
| 17 |
http://sesmar.eu.org/genview/ if you want to have a look at it. Needs |
| 18 |
libglade, PyGTK and gnome-python. It's basic, but i use it a lot for |
| 19 |
just checking the tree and searching it. This particular version i never |
| 20 |
put online btw, the others never had any extra root options. But those |
| 21 |
aren't very usuable anyway. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Anyway, what's my point here ? ;) I wouldn't mind having a look at your |
| 24 |
GUI and maybe even help out a bit in coding it. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
- fos |
Archives