| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:02:39 +0200
|
| 5 |
hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote:
|
| 6 |
> > Really? I thought it was pretty clearly. Yes, you need an |
| 7 |
> > implementation beforehand. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Maybe you should read: |
| 10 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0001.html |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> "The reference implementation must be completed before any GLEP is |
| 14 |
> given status "Final", but it need not be completed before the GLEP is |
| 15 |
> accepted." |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> This is not about some EAPI stuff, this is about getting it _accepted_ |
| 18 |
> not _implemented_. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
"Need not" does not mean "should not", and "completed" is not the same
|
| 21 |
as "exists". In this case, any reasonable observer will conclude that
|
| 22 |
for this particular problem, having a reasonable reference
|
| 23 |
implementation and a bunch of ebuilds to play with before we spend any
|
| 24 |
more time on discussion would be extremely helpful.
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
- --
|
| 27 |
Ciaran McCreesh
|
| 28 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| 29 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
iEYEARECAAYFAlBh2SwACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGw5ACg06dBcpHZ3Zfq5bQL7I8x7WPT
|
| 32 |
+WAAn1xpLtjISzwU1onKiZgG6jLpXV7J
|
| 33 |
=j+q2
|
| 34 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives