From: | Aron Griffis <agriffis@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] browserplugin vs. nsplugin | ||
Date: | Tue, 18 Oct 2005 18:48:07 | ||
Message-Id: | 20051018184417.GC14753@vino.zko.hp.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] browserplugin vs. nsplugin by Thomas Matthijs |
1 | Thomas Matthijs wrote: [Tue Oct 18 2005, 10:46:15AM EDT] |
2 | > We had discussed it prior and then nobody seemed to object to |
3 | > browserplugin, only after we changed it. |
4 | |
5 | Actually that's not true. |
6 | |
7 | http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@l.g.o/msg02898.html |
8 | |
9 | You see that karltk said he would be making the change to |
10 | browserplugin "over the course of the next few days". Diego responded |
11 | in the same day regarding nsplugins. I sent a message that day and |
12 | the following day, but there was no response from karltk or the java |
13 | team. |
14 | |
15 | http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@l.g.o/msg02896.html |
16 | http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@l.g.o/msg02911.html |
17 | http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@l.g.o/msg02925.html |
18 | |
19 | > You have the java herd's blessing to go ahead and change it. |
20 | > Please announce it to gentoo-java@ aswell when you make the change. |
21 | |
22 | Will do, thanks. |
23 | |
24 | Regards, |
25 | Aron |
26 | |
27 | -- |
28 | Aron Griffis |
29 | Gentoo Linux Developer |