| 1 |
On 2012.11.25 14:42, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Roy Bamford |
| 3 |
> <neddyseagoon@g.o> |
| 4 |
> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > From the point of view of the licencor, the licence is just as |
| 6 |
> > important as the code, so there are no trivial licence issues. |
| 7 |
> > As a trustee, I am unhappy with losing the traceability at all. |
| 8 |
> > Other trustees may have different opinions. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Not this one. License issues can vary in severity, and there may be |
| 11 |
> nuances that an outsider might not appreciate. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
[snip] |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Rich |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Rich, |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
That's my point - something serious may slip by without a bug. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Regards, |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Roy Bamford |
| 27 |
(Neddyseagoon) a member of |
| 28 |
elections |
| 29 |
gentoo-ops |
| 30 |
forum-mods |
| 31 |
trustees |
Archives