Archives
Archives
| From: | Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: new "qt" category | ||
| Date: | Thu, 17 Jan 2013 14:25:49 | ||
| Message-Id: | kd91kf$sm7$1@ger.gmane.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new "qt" category by Alexander Berntsen |
||
| 1 | On 18/01/2013 01:11, Alexander Berntsen wrote: |
| 2 | > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 3 | > Hash: SHA256 |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > - -1 here. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > It's a too specific category name. I can appreciate it easing the |
| 8 | > headaches for the maintainers, but from a design POV I dislike it. |
| 9 | > (For the record I also dislike KDE/GNOME/XFCE-categories.) |
| 10 | Where would you place the 300ish KDE core packages then? |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: new "qt" category | Alexander Berntsen <alexander@××××××.net> |