Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Things one could be upset about
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:48:01
Message-Id: 20150119104731.1e1959bf@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Things one could be upset about by Patrick Lauer
1 On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 19:35:09 +0800
2 Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > * AutoRepoman catches on average maybe 2 user-visible breakages.
5 > Mostly removing stable on HPPA ;)
6 > Fix: Make repoman faster (tree-wide scans take ~2 CPU-hours)
7 > Fix: Remind people that using repoman is not optional
8
9 repoman doesn't check reverse dependencies for the package you're
10 working on.
11
12 eshowkw(1) displays keywording in a pretty nice graph. Avoiding removing
13 the (last) stable ebuild probably involves having that automatically
14 invoked on entering (or working in, at some point) a package directory
15 and actually reading the output before you decide to remove any ebuild.
16
17
18 jer

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Things one could be upset about Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Things one could be upset about Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>