| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On 2019/08/15 16:47, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 8:33 AM Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
>> On 8/15/19 3:19 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 7 |
>>> I don't think that's a sane situation, so maybe the eclass should just |
| 8 |
>>> die here? (Basically, there are two possibilities: Either, things will |
| 9 |
>>> break if the dir is missing, then dying might be the best option. |
| 10 |
>>> Or, everything works without the dir, then the ebuild should set it to |
| 11 |
>>> /dev/null, in the first place.) |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>> That's my feeling as well. In 100% of cases so far, this has been a |
| 14 |
>> useful QA tool. Can we wait until that's not the case to change it? |
| 15 |
> I think an explicit die with a useful error message for the user would |
| 16 |
> be better than the status-quo. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I agree. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Kind Regards, |
| 22 |
Jaco |
Archives