Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Spider <spider@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Cc: calle@×××××.lan
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] libxml2 fix in progress
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 09:01:09
Message-Id: 20020325155737.1b9c6490.spider@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] libxml2 fix in progress by Carl-Christian Salvesen
1 Okies, Mail them to me :)
2
3 I'll mask XML-LibXML 0.91 until release of 1.0, and then fix up the others to work, unless somone has problems and acutely needs XML-LibXML for gentoo 1.0 :)
4
5 //Spider
6
7
8 begin quote
9 On Mon, 25 Mar 2002 10:23:43 +0100
10 Carl-Christian Salvesen <calle@×××××.lan> wrote:
11
12 > On Monday 25 March 2002 06:41, you wrote:
13 > > hello all,
14 > > Just wanted you to know that the recent libxml2 headers-include bug is "in
15 > > progress" and I'm going to get it all working as soon as my slow newtowrk
16 > > allows me to :)
17 > >
18 > > Could somone who's into perl coding, please check out dev-perl/XML-LibXML
19 > > and see if they can find just -why- this package breaks? I'm not a perl
20 > > coder and I didnt find any obvious solution to it.
21 > >
22 > > if this doesnt get fixed I'll mask it sometimes tue or wednesday.
23 >
24 > XML::LibXML-0.91-r1 is on portage, XML::LibXML-1.40 is on CPAN. :-)
25 >
26 > I've made ebuild for 1.40, but it depends on dev-perl/XML-SAX 0.10, and that
27 > again depends on dev-perl/XML-NamespaceSupport 1.04, both not in portage yet.
28 > AFAIK, no new packages will be accepted, so I really don't know what to do
29 > with it .. :)
30 >
31 > Tell me where to send it.. :)
32 >
33 > --
34 > CC Salvesen
35 > _______________________________________________
36 > gentoo-dev mailing list
37 > gentoo-dev@g.o
38 > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
39
40
41 --
42 begin happy99.exe
43 This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
44 See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
45 end

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] libxml2 fix in progress Carl-Christian Salvesen <calle@×××××.net>