| 1 |
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 08:47:10PM -0400, Jon Portnoy wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 08:44:42PM -0400, Jay Goodman Tamboli wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I just did a sync (server scrolled offscreen. logged |
| 4 |
> > anywhere?), and I notice lots of upgrades, including glibc |
| 5 |
> > to 2.3.2-r1 (from 2.3.1-r4). I started checking some of the |
| 6 |
> > CVS logs, and at least for glibc, man, and fileutils, the |
| 7 |
> > change of KEYWORD ~x86 to x86 was done by drobbins as part |
| 8 |
> > of "amd64" fixes. I'd like to be careful about a glibc |
| 9 |
> > upgrade, so can someone confirm that all these changes are |
| 10 |
> > intentional and correct? |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > /jgt |
| 13 |
> > -- |
| 14 |
> > I would sooner fail than not be among the greatest. -- John Keats |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> No, this was an accident. drobbins is currently fixing it. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Let me amend that: glibc 2.3.2 is going to be stable on x86 from here on |
| 20 |
out. There is no other choice - reverting to 2.3.1 would break more |
| 21 |
things than it'd fix. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Jon Portnoy |
| 25 |
avenj/irc.freenode.net |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives