| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 11:11:17 -0400 "Nathan L. Adams" <nadams@××××.org> |
| 6 |
> wrote: |
| 7 |
> | I do software development, systems integration, and bug squashing for |
| 8 |
> | a living. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Gentoo's 'moving target' development model is not the development model |
| 11 |
> used by your typical 'stable release once or twice per year' large |
| 12 |
> software development project. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Ah, how about this: |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Most of Gentoo's developers are concerned with Ebuilds (packaging if you |
| 18 |
will). A small subset of developers are concerned with Portage itself. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Would have a *slightly* improved QA process on Portage development be |
| 21 |
such a bad thing/impossible. As I posted earlier, all I'm suggesting is |
| 22 |
*one* verification check by the Team Lead or the reporter before marking |
| 23 |
a bug as done. And Portage is arguably more stable and less fluid than |
| 24 |
the entirety of the ebuild tree. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Nathan |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 29 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 30 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
iD8DBQFCz/aK2QTTR4CNEQARApI1AKCH+XUcl4FR7xjZIK4V+GQPUFXoLACeJc5W |
| 33 |
M00736E0mlNtN7IqEqDh6wA= |
| 34 |
=Y9+n |
| 35 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives