Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Java 9 on Gentoo
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 15:10:42
Message-Id: assp.049506194b.20171118101030.5de9efd1@wlt.obsidian-studios.com
1 Eating spam for breakfast! Glorious Spam!
2 http://cdn.ipernity.com/142/50/59/32265059.4aebaf91.640.jpg
3 https://landof10000words.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/sir-can-a-lot.jpg
4
5 On Sat, 18 Nov 2017 09:59:15 -0500
6 "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com> wrote:
7 >
8 > That is also the main reason for Icedtea project existence beyond
9 > having a FOSS harness to build/boostrap OpenJDK/Java. Oracle JDK may
10 > only support certain archs. If you want to build on another, that is
11 > where Icedtea plays a role. Though again still have other issues,
12 > Hotspot, Zero, OpenJ9, legacy JamVM, etc.
13
14 Ideally these are like USE flags, some are already for icedtea.
15
16 cacao, jamvm, and zero, in addition to default HotSpot.
17 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Java_virtual_machines
18
19 No clue if icedtea/gnuandrew is looking to add support for OpenJ9. That
20 would likely be a big one since its from IBM, and the core to their JDK
21 for Power.
22
23 IBM also has a JDK, not packaged on Gentoo. Everyone already hates
24 Oracle so little interest in IBM. Ideally Gentoo should have it, though
25 not sure if it will continue on beyond 8. Maybe why they released J9.
26 It does support different archs.
27 https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/
28
29 --
30 William L. Thomson Jr.