| 1 |
I like the idea, i dont think packages change their license so often |
| 2 |
so, we could either: |
| 3 |
- Keep the metadata just of the current stable version of the package |
| 4 |
or |
| 5 |
- Allow to specify multiple license |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Personally i think keeping the metadata only of the current stable |
| 8 |
ebuild is the best way, other ebuilds could just contain building-data |
| 9 |
and this would be nice also cause would be clear which is the current |
| 10 |
"adviced" version of certain package (for this porpouse i propose to |
| 11 |
specify the version of the current stable package in the metadata.xml |
| 12 |
file) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Giovedì, 3 Lug 2003, alle 12:03 Europe/Rome, Patrick Kursawe ha scritto: |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 11:59:21AM +0200, Heinrich Wendel wrote: |
| 17 |
>> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0005.html |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> comments are welcome. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> How to handle the situation when a package changes its license and |
| 22 |
> older versions are distributed unter a different license than newer |
| 23 |
> versions? |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Just wondering, |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Patrick |
| 28 |
> <mime-attachment> |
| 29 |
Michele Balistreri |
| 30 |
Gentoo Developer, KDE Team |
| 31 |
Rome, Italy |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives