1 |
Why do all these spinoff companies keep getting made to work on what is |
2 |
supposed to be a meta-distribution? Why can't it all be kept unified |
3 |
under one umbrella? |
4 |
|
5 |
Why did you have to fork and found a company to target embedded and |
6 |
enterprise users and developers? |
7 |
|
8 |
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 18:08:55 -0700 |
9 |
Zach Welch <zwelch@g.o> wrote: |
10 |
|
11 |
> Fellow Gentooers, |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I am proud to announce that The Zynot Foundation was registered today |
14 |
> as a 501.c.3 member controlled, non-profit organization in the state |
15 |
> of Oregon. This new entity is being established to hold a fork of the |
16 |
> Gentoo Linux distribution, targeting embedded and enterprise users and |
17 |
> developers. We will be establishing a new development culture |
18 |
> suitable for creating a reliable, validated, and production-ready |
19 |
> distribution - initially using the Gentoo technology we all have come |
20 |
> to know and love. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> While I am currently leading this effort, I have already attracted a |
23 |
> number of others willing to help me guide this project through its |
24 |
> initial growing pains. In the next couple of months, I expect this |
25 |
> project to evolve as truly community run organization, and we will be |
26 |
> drafting the foundation's bylaws out in the open, accepting input from |
27 |
> the community thoughout the entire process. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> I humbly submit that every present or future Gentoo user, developer, |
30 |
> client, or investor should read my paper at the following URL. In |
31 |
> great detail, it describes the events that drove me to this current |
32 |
> state of affairs, the reasoning behind the fork (along with a section |
33 |
> covering the most current events), along with a brief glimpse at the |
34 |
> choices this fork will be offering the community that grows around it: |
35 |
> |
36 |
> http://www.zynot.org/info/fork.html |
37 |
> |
38 |
> and the following links has some initial questions answered about the |
39 |
> future and other ideas: |
40 |
> |
41 |
> http://www.zynot.org/info/faq.html |
42 |
> |
43 |
> We are working to establish parallel infrastructure at Oregon State |
44 |
> University; however, my resources have been heavily invested in the |
45 |
> Gentoo project, both material and finacially, and many of the details |
46 |
> of those investments are documented in the above paper. My attornys |
47 |
> have sent a letter to Mr. Robbins requesting these investments be |
48 |
> returned. |
49 |
> |
50 |
> For those that would speculate about the timing of this announcement, |
51 |
> my paper presents facts that suggest the recent re-organization post |
52 |
> by Daniel Robbins was a pre-emptive and unsuccessful attempt to |
53 |
> short-circuit this fork. Consider that fact along with the remaining |
54 |
> evidence presented in my paper as you read the inevitable damage and |
55 |
> spin control that follows this post. |
56 |
> |
57 |
> I would like to invite Daniel Robbins to meet me at LinuxWorld |
58 |
> Expo, 2003, for a head-to-head public debate about the issues |
59 |
> surrounding this fork. The Zynot Foundation has registered booth #5 |
60 |
> in the .org pavillion, and we are looking forward to talking with |
61 |
> everyone then and there. In the meantime, come join us on IRC in |
62 |
> #zynot |
63 |
> or #zynot-dev on irc.freenode.net where there is sure to be lively |
64 |
> discussion. |
65 |
> |
66 |
> Finally, I would like to thank all of the users and developers that |
67 |
> have made Gentoo a wonderful technology, and I look forward to being |
68 |
> able to give something substantial back to the community with this new |
69 |
> distribution. Thank you for the memories. |
70 |
> |
71 |
> Sincerely, |
72 |
> |
73 |
> Zachary T Welch |
74 |
> Managing Member |
75 |
> Superlucidity Services |
76 |
> zwelch@×××××××××××××.net |
77 |
> |
78 |
> |
79 |
> -- |
80 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
81 |
> |
82 |
> |
83 |
|
84 |
-- |
85 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |