| 1 |
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Currently, a problem is that everybody uses different formatting |
| 4 |
> for stabilization bug reports making them more difficult to be parsed. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
For clarity, are we talking about parsing by a human brain, or parsing |
| 8 |
by a computer program? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
If the latter, would it make more sense to just break things out into |
| 11 |
fields, instead of carefully building a structured text field which we |
| 12 |
then have to carefully break back down? We might as well start |
| 13 |
sticking xml in the summary. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
If we're talking about human parsing, can you give an example of how |
| 16 |
variation makes your life more difficult today? I'm just trying to |
| 17 |
understand what we're trying to fix... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Rich |
Archives