Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
To: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 3.4 and ~x86
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 03:28:24
Message-Id: 1095564460.26130.1831.camel@simple
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 3.4 and ~x86 by Donnie Berkholz
1 On Sat, 2004-09-18 at 23:20, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
2 > On Sat, 2004-09-18 at 08:02, Daniel Goller wrote:
3 > > ^^ yeah sure like we will have more devs help test a new toolchain, you
4 > > forget it doesnt come with translucency and shadows, something that
5 > > guarantees you plenty of (dev) testers, what's gcc, just some thing
6 > > portage calls to build stuff, who would care about that?
7 >
8 > C'mon, we run Gentoo. Just tell people it optimizes their code better
9 > and everything will run faster. They'll swarm to it.
10
11 Just in case anybody missed this one. (Linux C and C++ Compilers)
12 http://www.coyotegulch.com/reviews/linux_compilers
13 Gentoo linux was used for his testing.
14
15 --
16 Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
17 Gentoo (hardened,security,infrastructure,embedded,toolchain) Developer

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 3.4 and ~x86 Stuart Herbert <stuart@g.o>