Archives
Archives
| From: | Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Is X86 uclibc environment supported? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 03 May 2016 14:25:13 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4388b9c4-565c-ea55-44e9-989d4c1d5526@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Is X86 uclibc environment supported? by waltdnes@waltdnes.org | ||
| 1 | On 02/05/16 05:27 PM, waltdnes@××××××××.org wrote: |
| 2 | > Let me know offline if/when you need a beta tester. I have QEMU and |
| 3 | > an ancient 32-bit-only Atom netbook that could really use a smaller |
| 4 | > libc. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Is musl a good choice perhaps? iirc it's support right now is better |
| 8 | than uclibc... |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Is X86 uclibc environment supported? | Ian Bloss <ianlinkcd@×××××.com> |