| 1 |
On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 20:12, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> in the spirit of moving to generic names, i plan on changing over all |
| 3 |
> references to 'virtual/glibc' to 'virtual/libc' in a bit |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> this has been discussed before, i'm just sending out a heads up that it'll |
| 6 |
> actually be happening, so when you get errors about virtual/glibc with |
| 7 |
> repoman, `cvs up` ! |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Hey I just updated my cvs tree and did a quick search and found 3026 |
| 10 |
.ebuilds still have references to virtual/glibc ( See attached |
| 11 |
virtual_glibc.txt.gz ) |
| 12 |
Is there any reason to hold off on updating all the portage metadata for |
| 13 |
this that you/we/others can think of other than it being time consuming? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> -mike |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> -- |
| 18 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 21 |
Gentoo (hardened,security,infrastructure,embedded,toolchain) Developer |
Archives