| 1 |
emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "archfs". |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Perhaps a link to the homepage/ overlay might be handy? ;) |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
This is not "something that's about the technical development of our tree" |
| 6 |
so it might be considered off-topic (interesting though it might be.) As a |
| 7 |
general rule, the Unsupported Software forum is a good place to get |
| 8 |
feedback from users til something is releasable. (Apologies if you've |
| 9 |
already gone thru that process, just mention it and give the url in that |
| 10 |
case.) At that point getting feedback from devs as to it's suitability for |
| 11 |
inclusion is acceptable, aiui, although even then you're probably just |
| 12 |
going to get told to get on #gentoo-sunrise (irc.freenode.org) and work on |
| 13 |
getting it into the main overlay before it makes the portage tree. (Unless |
| 14 |
ofc a dev wants to pick it up out of interest.) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
BTW I don't recommend autotools (there's a reason they're called autohell ;) |
| 17 |
especially if you're not writing from scratch. (That's why you get all |
| 18 |
those redundant configure checks..) A simple system.mk which gets included |
| 19 |
in the makefile is a lot easier for everyone. ion3 (which is now in mabi's |
| 20 |
overlay iirc) does this, and it's a doddle to configure. (I think it was |
| 21 |
one or two sed calls.) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives