Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/blogtk: blogtk-1.0.ebuild
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:24:31
Message-Id: 4CC9A3D0.6050406@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/blogtk: blogtk-1.0.ebuild by Alexis Ballier
1 On 10/28/2010 05:17 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
2 > On Thursday 28 October 2010 10:02:35 Samuli Suominen wrote:
3 >>>> --- blogtk-1.0.ebuild 26 Jul 2008 22:48:58 -0000 1.6
4 >>>> +++ blogtk-1.0.ebuild 28 Oct 2010 12:32:21 -0000 1.7
5 >>>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
6 >>>> -# Copyright 1999-2007 Gentoo Foundation
7 >>>> +# Copyright 1999-2010 Gentoo Foundation
8 > [..]
9 >>>> inherit eutils
10 >>>
11 >>> what's this change for ? blogtk-2 stabilization will come soon anyway...
12 >>
13 >> kind of obvious, isn't it? someone edited the ebuild without updating
14 >> ebuild header to 2010, repoman bitched about it. :)
15 >
16 > Good luck if you want to fix these "issues", I'm pretty sure there are
17 > hundreds of such warnings in the tree.
18 >
19 >
20 > A.
21 >
22
23 That's why I take it category by category basis to keep my sanity. Fact
24 is there are none left in net-misc/ which can't be bad, can it?