| 1 |
On 06/27/10 17:04, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 2 |
[snip] |
| 3 |
> Whilst I do understand that these arches are understaffed and they can't keep |
| 4 |
> up with the increased stabilization load like x86/amd64 do, I still |
| 5 |
> think that slow stabilization leads to an obsolete stable tree which I |
| 6 |
> doesn't make sense to me after all. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Thoughts? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I see two scenarios - either we get the "slow" arches enough cpu- and |
| 12 |
manpower, or we remove their stable keywords. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
If possible I think we should try to keep stable keywords. So how can we |
| 15 |
help? I'm not sure how I could help e.g. PPC - I don't have any hardware |
| 16 |
I can test on, and I'm not aware of remotely accessible dev boxen. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
So - how can we improve this situation? |
Archives