| 1 |
I like the xml generation pass but i have a few questions: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
does the xml-publish transaction lend a greater window of opportunity |
| 4 |
for mirror rsync de-sync? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
does it make sense for digest info be sucked up into the xml pass, to |
| 7 |
be superceded by the legacy files where present ala |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
ebuild x-y/z.ebuild digest |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
should the xml be digested? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
On May 27, 2005, at 8:51 AM, Simon Stelling wrote: |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> Brian Harring wrote: |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
>>> I definitively like the idea, it should speed up emerge -s |
| 20 |
>>> enormously |
| 21 |
>>> |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
>> Unlikely... stable portage knows of metadata.xml *explicitly* in two |
| 24 |
>> places, repoman's commit code, and digest checking, neither of which |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives