| 1 |
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:20:55 +0200 |
| 2 |
Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> >> because EAPI1 isn't specified completely so you don't have a large |
| 4 |
> >> field to cover but you also do not know the bounds of it. |
| 5 |
> > It really doesn't matter how it is specified. You have an |
| 6 |
> > implementation of it and should make sure, that this implementation |
| 7 |
> > works. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Seems to works well enough for people using it. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Presumably those people, if they exist, haven't tried to go through and |
| 12 |
install every EAPI 1 package in the tree (excluding KDE, since that's |
| 13 |
big and slow, and starting backwards since the x11- categories are nice |
| 14 |
and pretty). |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives