| 1 |
On 1/20/20 1:39 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> I'm going to be blunt. We arbitrarily made a decision that /home |
| 4 |
> belongs to sysadmin. Please respect that. If you really believe your |
| 5 |
> package is *this* special to justify changing this arbitrary decision, |
| 6 |
> the burden of proof lies on you. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Ok. How to move forward? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
The old user.eclass allowed using /home, and we have packages using |
| 12 |
/home. One of them is spamd, and I've beaten to death the reasons why I |
| 13 |
think that's the best choice. I would rather not move it somewhere |
| 14 |
*less* appropriate on principle. I would also like to not break running |
| 15 |
mail systems the second the acct-user package is emerged. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
What are the options? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
* Upgrade to GLEP81 anyway and ignore the warning (my interim plan). |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
* Hack the acct-user ebuild so that it doesn't trigger the warning, by |
| 22 |
bypassing $D. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
* Leave it on user.eclass. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
* ??? |
Archives