1 |
On 1/18/20 2:08 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Sounds like you've created an arbitrary rule that prevents the two |
4 |
> packages from using the same directory, and therefore you've created |
5 |
> this problem yourself. Why not just go back and reconsider using |
6 |
> the same directory instead of adding complexity for ideological reasons? |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Is it really that problematic to have the directory created by amavisd |
9 |
> user, and have all packages depend on it? |
10 |
> |
11 |
|
12 |
The user's home directory is conceptually and (usually) literally |
13 |
separate from the daemon's working directory. That's upstream, not in my |
14 |
head. So it's wrong to combine them in principle, especially given that |
15 |
it creates security timebombs when two packages "share" a directory. |