1 |
On Thu, 2002-02-07 at 08:55, Matthew Kennedy wrote: |
2 |
> My conclusion is that gtk-xemacs-21.1.12_p3 should be superseded by a |
3 |
> xemacs-21.4.x --with-gnome --with-gtk (which i'm testing now on my own |
4 |
> machine for 21.4.6 and plan to submit to bugs.gentoo.org). I would call |
5 |
> the package, app-editors/gtk-xemacs/gtk-xemacs-21.4.6.ebuild and it |
6 |
> would be distinct from app-editors/xemacs/xemacs-21.4.x.ebuild (which |
7 |
> would remain motif/athena builds). Does this plan sound about right to |
8 |
> the more experienced contributors and maintainers? |
9 |
|
10 |
Hello, |
11 |
|
12 |
last time I checked out xemacs with gtk support is was not long ago, it |
13 |
was already a 21.4.x. However is was considered experimental and really |
14 |
didn't functional well. There were a lot of interface bugs amongst which |
15 |
the lack of scrollbars for instance. If such an ebuild would be added, |
16 |
it should be very well tested to check if it can be considered stable |
17 |
for regular usage. |
18 |
|
19 |
Best regards, |
20 |
|
21 |
Geert |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Geert Bevin |
25 |
the Leaf sprl/bvba |
26 |
"Use what you need" Pierre Theunisstraat 1/47 |
27 |
http://www.theleaf.be 1030 Brussels |
28 |
gbevin@×××××××.be Tel & Fax +32 2 241 19 98 |