Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, fuzzyray@g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-portage/gentoolkit: ChangeLog gentoolkit-0.2.4_rc1.ebuild
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 01:54:59
Message-Id: 20070927013931.GB22279@supernova
1 On 00:18 Thu 27 Sep , Paul Varner (fuzzyray) wrote:
2 > 1.1 app-portage/gentoolkit/gentoolkit-0.2.4_rc1.ebuild
3 >
4 > file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-portage/gentoolkit/gentoolkit-0.2.4_rc1.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
5 > plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-portage/gentoolkit/gentoolkit-0.2.4_rc1.ebuild?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain
6
7 > src_install() {
8 > emake DESTDIR="${D}" install-gentoolkit || die "install-gentoolkit failed"
9 > }
10 >
11 > pkg_postinst() {
12 > python_mod_optimize "${ROOT}"usr/lib/gentoolkit
13 > echo
14 > elog "Another alternative to equery is app-portage/portage-utils"
15 > elog
16 > elog "For further information on gentoolkit, please read the gentoolkit"
17 > elog "guide: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoolkit.xml"
18 > elog
19 > }
20 >
21 > pkg_postrm() {
22 > python_mod_cleanup "${ROOT}"usr/lib/gentoolkit
23
24 Shouldn't gentoolkit go into get_libdir() instead of lib? Portage
25 appears to...
26
27 Thanks,
28 Donnie
29 --
30 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies