| 1 |
On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 7:34 PM John Helmert III <ajak@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 07:23:33PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Proprietary tools do contribute to this since they can |
| 5 |
> > generate results that are harder to reproduce, but if they are clear |
| 6 |
> > and accurate and actionable it could still be a net-positive. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> In some cases, yes, this is exactly the problem. This was one of the |
| 9 |
> bugs reported in the now-deleted issue tracking repository on Github. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
This was hinted at earlier in the thread. My goal wasn't to say |
| 13 |
whether it was or was not an issue, but bring the focus more on the |
| 14 |
tangible impact, as I think that will probably help to make this less |
| 15 |
about philosophy and more about impact. I think that is more likely |
| 16 |
to create action (whether that is a policy change or improvement to |
| 17 |
the tooling). |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Rich |
Archives