Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Use full package atoms for bug reports
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 23:45:35
Message-Id: pan.2009.01.04.23.45.11@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Use full package atoms for bug reports by Jeroen Roovers
1 Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> posted
2 20090104174353.22981e4e@××××××××××××××××.net, excerpted below, on Sun, 04
3 Jan 2009 17:43:53 +0100:
4
5 > On Sun, 4 Jan 2009 14:52:11 +0100
6 > Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o> wrote:
7 >
8 >> Please be so kind and use full package atoms in the bug description
9 >> line (especially when bug wrangling), searching is made easier that
10 >> way.
11 >
12 > "Bug reports that refer to a single or a few (similar) packages should
13 > detail the package atom(s) as completely as possible in the Summary,
14 > including a version only when other versions do not exhibit the
15 > bug."[1]
16
17 > [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/bug-wranglers/
18
19 I think the problem is more as in this bug. Note the "Amarok2", the
20 reason I ended up filing a dup, because I searched for "amarok-2" and
21 didn't catch this bug. Someone with the authority to do so might wish to
22 change the summary accordingly... altho it does seem most CCs were able
23 to find the bug without the dup I ended up with, and the bug is still
24 getting frequent CC additions.
25
26 Amarok2 - dev-db/mysql-community - ld: /usr/lib64/mysql/libmysqld.a
27 (client.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S against `client_errors' can not be
28 used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
29
30 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=238487
31
32 --
33 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
34 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
35 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Use full package atoms for bug reports Mike Auty <ikelos@g.o>