| 1 |
El mar, 27-03-2012 a las 14:53 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius escribió: |
| 2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 3 |
> Hash: SHA256 |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> On 27/03/12 02:47 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 6 |
> > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev |
| 7 |
> > <tetromino@g.o> |
| 8 |
> >> The partitioning scheme is something that the user needs to |
| 9 |
> >> decide on *before* getting Gentoo up and running. After the user |
| 10 |
> >> had finished installing the operating system, it's too late to |
| 11 |
> >> inform him about the advantages of a separate /usr/portage. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > Yes and no (if you have free space, you could easily move |
| 14 |
> > /usr/portage - some other changes are harder). |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > However, you could extend this line of argument to raid, lvm, and |
| 17 |
> > even stuff like the use of systemd or an alternative package |
| 18 |
> > manager. All of those things are much easier to implement if you |
| 19 |
> > just start out with them. |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > I'm all for creating a wiki to talk about some alternative |
| 22 |
> > options. Perhaps even link to it at the start of the handbook in |
| 23 |
> > the intro (if you're not in a rush and want to read about more |
| 24 |
> > advanced configurations, check out ...). |
| 25 |
> > |
| 26 |
> > However, I tend to agree that the handbook should be a |
| 27 |
> > nearly-foolproof no-frills Gentoo installation. |
| 28 |
> > |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> You know, we have "Code Listing 2.1: Filesystem Example" in Section 4, |
| 32 |
> we could always adjust that to have a /usr/portage partition in it |
| 33 |
> (take a bit of space away from /home, or something) |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> It doesn't recommend/require anything, but when users see it they'll |
| 36 |
> think about it. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
This would be a good option, but I would anyway add a note warning |
| 39 |
people about the cons of having portage tree in a normal partition with |
| 40 |
the rest of the system, otherwise people could simply ignore that code |
| 41 |
listing because they could thing it's there simply on a try to get all |
| 42 |
system "splitted" ;) (for example, I don't usually have a separate |
| 43 |
partition for all what is listed there, only /, /home and /usr/portage) |
Archives