1 |
On 06/23/2017 09:28 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
2 |
> Hi everyone, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Since late April, grsecurity upstream has stop making their patches |
5 |
> available publicly. Without going into details, the reason for their |
6 |
> decision revolves around disputes about how their patches were being |
7 |
> (ab)used. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Since the grsecurity patch formed the main core of our hardened-sources |
10 |
> kernel, their decision has serious repercussions for the Hardened Gentoo |
11 |
> project. I will no longer be able to support hardened-sources and will |
12 |
> have to eventually mask and remove it from the tree. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Hardened Gentoo has two sides to it, kernel hardening (done via |
15 |
> hardened-sources) and toolchain/executable hardening. The two are |
16 |
> interrelated but independent enough that toolchain hardening can |
17 |
> continue on its own. The hardened kernel, however, provided PaX |
18 |
> protection for executables and this will be lost. We did a lot of work |
19 |
> to properly maintain PaX markings in our package management system and |
20 |
> there was no part of Gentoo that wasn't touched by issues stemming from |
21 |
> PaX support. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> I waited two months before saying anything because the reasons were more |
24 |
> of a political nature than some technical issue. At this point, I think |
25 |
> its time to let the community know about the state of affairs with |
26 |
> hardened-sources. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> I can no longer get into the #grsecurity/OFTC channel (nothing personal, |
29 |
> they kicked everyone), and so I have not spoken to spengler or pipacs. |
30 |
> I don't know if they will ever release grsecurity patches again. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> My plan then is as follows. I'll wait one more month and then send out |
33 |
> a news item and later mask hardened-sources for removal. I don't |
34 |
> recommend we remove any of the machinery from Gentoo that deals with PaX |
35 |
> markings. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> I welcome feedback. |
38 |
> |
39 |
Thanks for taking the time to let the greater Gentoo community know. |
40 |
It's a shame things took this turn... Is there any hope of a fork |
41 |
emerging from the drama? Why would a security-conscious group take their |
42 |
toys and go home? Regardless, this is a loss for Linux as a whole. I |
43 |
hope something springs up in its place. |
44 |
|
45 |
-- |
46 |
Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer |
47 |
OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net |
48 |
fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C 1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6 |