| 1 |
On Fri, 4 May 2012 06:50:12 +0200 |
| 2 |
Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:06:08 -0700 |
| 5 |
> Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > On 04/25/2012 09:45 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: |
| 8 |
> > > Could we detect user patches touching autoconf files somehow, |
| 9 |
> > > maybe by hashing them beforehand |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > There's an implementation of that inside |
| 12 |
> > autotools-utils_src_prepare. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> There's all kinds of reasons to not use autotools-utils.eclass. |
| 15 |
> I wouldn't want to see another python.eclass bullying around the tree. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
504 autotools-utils.eclass |
| 18 |
3186 python.eclass |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Do you have any real arguments? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Best regards, |
| 24 |
Michał Górny |
Archives