Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: hasufell <hasufell@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 19:55:04
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by Arun Raghavan
Hash: SHA1

+1 for git

I am more used to it, I find it easier to use regarding the utilities
as well as the gui and it is more consistent.
The fact alone that I can update a single directory in CVS without
updating all others can cause breakage, cause repoman checks may be

On 05/23/2012 09:37 PM, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> I, for one, think we should stay with CVS and leave all this git > Linusware to the new-fangled Fedora kids with their fancy init > systems and tight coupling. CVS was good enough for my grandfather, > and it's good enough for you.
This sounds rather emotional to me. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPvT/OAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzgPIH/38QflM4GNiUNo3bC5/8tock FM03JE1Iln4ThvLl25opwGiO5R8akoD3koroUVPLoWV//QfYmcQIm7k7dJJCk4+m WSQ6H21fL9v2m6QX7PuJwaENFSFBxu3UFy6BE+39iFJAPBiigH1hbE0rad/twYdr xhnHZti1rGbaFBeXxlGmdhJYi7dtndyuZgTu0oQFfE0+sAAK2GPe5CGLoOFHdtxS WCMY3C3cB0R7XPoJwUvvt2KmIEXNWfq6rDW3o6so89VdRSNykwMLdK1eZ+MZidIE 61CAJiuIsT4cKX5pbqo72GtU4tUOkQ6jjaJhofAcrSMYKA0IsxYvFAYnKqO4lh4= =cdBk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----