Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] metadata.xsd: upstream maintainer must have exactly one <name/> element
Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 08:09:46
Message-Id: DC0B0198-D4A9-47CC-90F4-1523E5190655@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] metadata.xsd: upstream maintainer must have exactly one element by Dirkjan Ochtman
1 Dnia 6 maja 2016 09:39:24 CEST, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> napisał(a):
2 >On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 1:16 AM, Göktürk Yüksek <gokturk@××××××××××.edu>
3 >wrote:
4 >> Signed-off-by: Göktürk Yüksek <gokturk@××××××××××.edu>
5 >> ---
6 >> metadata.xsd | 2 +-
7 >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
8 >>
9 >> diff --git a/metadata.xsd b/metadata.xsd
10 >> index 8bc6a4e..fe2c5d2 100644
11 >> --- a/metadata.xsd
12 >> +++ b/metadata.xsd
13 >> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@
14 >> <xs:element name='email' type='emailType'
15 >> minOccurs='0'/>
16 >> <xs:element name='name' type='xs:token'
17 >> - minOccurs='0'/>
18 >> + minOccurs='1'/>
19 >> </xs:all>
20 >> <xs:attribute name='status'
21 >type='upstreamMaintainerStatusAttrType'
22 >> default='unknown'/>
23 >
24 >IMO this patch could do with a bit more rationale. Personally, I don't
25 >like this change, as it seems enough in many cases to just add an
26 >email address for an upstream maintainer (for example, maybe the
27 >upstream maintainer is a mailing list?).
28
29 That's what the original GLEP said (sorry, i don't have the no handy, the one about upstream element).
30
31 >
32 >Cheers,
33 >
34 >Dirkjan
35
36
37 --
38 Best regards,
39 Michał Górny (by phone)