1 |
Dnia 6 maja 2016 09:39:24 CEST, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> napisał(a): |
2 |
>On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 1:16 AM, Göktürk Yüksek <gokturk@××××××××××.edu> |
3 |
>wrote: |
4 |
>> Signed-off-by: Göktürk Yüksek <gokturk@××××××××××.edu> |
5 |
>> --- |
6 |
>> metadata.xsd | 2 +- |
7 |
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> diff --git a/metadata.xsd b/metadata.xsd |
10 |
>> index 8bc6a4e..fe2c5d2 100644 |
11 |
>> --- a/metadata.xsd |
12 |
>> +++ b/metadata.xsd |
13 |
>> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ |
14 |
>> <xs:element name='email' type='emailType' |
15 |
>> minOccurs='0'/> |
16 |
>> <xs:element name='name' type='xs:token' |
17 |
>> - minOccurs='0'/> |
18 |
>> + minOccurs='1'/> |
19 |
>> </xs:all> |
20 |
>> <xs:attribute name='status' |
21 |
>type='upstreamMaintainerStatusAttrType' |
22 |
>> default='unknown'/> |
23 |
> |
24 |
>IMO this patch could do with a bit more rationale. Personally, I don't |
25 |
>like this change, as it seems enough in many cases to just add an |
26 |
>email address for an upstream maintainer (for example, maybe the |
27 |
>upstream maintainer is a mailing list?). |
28 |
|
29 |
That's what the original GLEP said (sorry, i don't have the no handy, the one about upstream element). |
30 |
|
31 |
> |
32 |
>Cheers, |
33 |
> |
34 |
>Dirkjan |
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
Best regards, |
39 |
Michał Górny (by phone) |