| 1 |
On Tuesday 28 September 2004 11:24, Peter Ruskin wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tuesday 28 September 2004 09:19, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Do you realize that this would amount to serious patches on kde. KDE |
| 4 |
> > expects KDEDIR(S) to work the way it does currently. I know it is not |
| 5 |
> > ideal, but neither is the FHS. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Well I think it *is* ideal the way we have it - that was one of the |
| 8 |
> many things that attracted me to Gentoo in the first place. It's the |
| 9 |
> most sensible way I've come across for organizing KDE/Qt and we should |
| 10 |
> not even consider abandoning it. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Ideal to me would be a way that has the same power as the current way, but |
| 13 |
without getting on the edge of the FHS (so also pleasing the people who |
| 14 |
value that greatly). I agree however that this is probably the best way |
| 15 |
to do it as long as the FHS does not really offer support for our way of |
| 16 |
operation. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Paul |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 22 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 23 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 24 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives