Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Spider <spider@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage suggestion
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 19:01:34
Message-Id: 20040214200128.0a7d5df1.spider@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage suggestion by Thomas de Grenier de Latour
1 begin quote
2 On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 19:54:46 +0100
3 Thomas de Grenier de Latour <degrenier@×××××××××××.fr> wrote:
4
5 > On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 19:28:25 +0100
6 > foser <foser@×××××××××××××××××.net> wrote:
7
8
9 > What kind of behavior would you expect from such a dep? Assume you
10 > have gnome-libs installed without esd support and your package depends
11 > on gnome-libs with esd. Should emerge force reinstallation of
12 > gnome-libs, or just fail? I'm just curious.
13
14 DEPEND="gnome-base/gnome-libs[+esd]" or somekind, if that isn't
15 supported, force a re-merge of gnome-libs with USE="+esd" no matter what
16 said person had before.
17
18
19 //Spider
20
21
22 --
23 begin .signature
24 Tortured users / Laughing in pain
25 See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
26 end