Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Alin Năstac" <mrness@g.o>
To: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, net-proxy@g.o, qa@g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: net-proxy/squid needs your love
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 17:11:29
Message-Id: 4C599F04.2080905@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] net-proxy/squid needs your love by Markos Chandras
1 Hi Markos,
2
3 I'm very busy in real life, but I'll try to solve all squid issues this
4 week.
5 Btw, [2] and [3] were solved from net-proxy's perspective and [1]
6 wasn't fixed by upstream AFAIK.
7
8 Cheers,
9 Alin
10
11 On 04/08/2010 13:50, Markos Chandras wrote:
12 > Hi there
13 >
14 > net-proxy/squid needs your love. Bug #311927 and Bug #304751 require a
15 > version bump. Our user community did an excellent job there providing an
16 > improved ebuild for that. Furthermore there are several open security
17 > bugs wrt squid [1][2][3][4]. net-proxy herd what is your status?
18 > Security bugs should be your first priority. If you are unable to
19 > maintain certain packages you could ask for help instead of staying
20 > quiet. Maybe we should list this
21 > package as maintainer-needed and request some proxy-maintainers from our
22 > user community. What do you think about that?
23 >
24 > @Council: Yet another example that we need to track the status of every
25 > single project in order to have a clear picture of which projects are
26 > active and which are dead
27 >
28 > @QA: Should step up and commit these ebuilds just to get
29 > rid of the security bugs which, frankly, don't look that good ( distro
30 > wise ). I know technically is not our job, but we need to step up here
31 > and either fix the security bugs since net-proxy can't do that, or mask
32 > this package which is a no-go.
33 >
34 > [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/261208
35 > [2] http://bugs.gentoo.org/279379
36 > [3] http://bugs.gentoo.org/279380
37 > [4] http://bugs.gentoo.org/301828
38 >

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: net-proxy/squid needs your love Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>