| 1 |
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 07:34:16PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 18 May 2006 20:20:29 +0200 Carsten Lohrke <carlo@g.o> |
| 3 |
> wrote: |
| 4 |
> | On Thursday 18 May 2006 20:02, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 5 |
> | >It's kinda like this: |
| 6 |
> | |
| 7 |
> | Stop making such odd and wrong comparisons. The package manager is |
| 8 |
> | part of what defines a distribution, choosing a shell is the users |
| 9 |
> | choice. If you want to make the package manager matter of choice, |
| 10 |
> | start your own distribution. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> How many package managers does Debian have? What about Fedora? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
They all support the exact same format. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
You're changing the format, dropping what you dislike- they also |
| 17 |
support the same installed pkgs backend last I looked, again, not the |
| 18 |
case for paludis. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Better example please, because they're doing what paludis *should* be |
| 21 |
doing. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
~harring |
Archives