Archives
Archives
| From: | MAL <mal@×××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Eric Andresen <ndiin1@×××.net> | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.47-r2 testing | ||
| Date: | Thu, 20 Feb 2003 10:29:57 | ||
| Message-Id: | 3E54ABDA.4070805@komcept.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.47-r2 testing by Eric Andresen |
||
| 1 | Eric Andresen wrote: |
| 2 | > On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 19:56, Terje Kvernes wrote: |
| 3 | > I'm willing to bet that the problem is caused by that particular |
| 4 | > ebuild's changing of the PATH. Just a thought. ;) |
| 5 | |
| 6 | I don't see how.. I have a few (>3) 1.4 systems that went through the |
| 7 | upgrade fine, and looking at them, I can't see any difference in the |
| 8 | PATH settings, between them and my updated-1.2 system. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | MAL |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.47-r2 testing | Eric Andresen <ndiin1@×××.net> |