| 1 |
On 07-04-2010 00:21, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 09:06:24AM -0400, Richard Freeman wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Why not just get rid of the in-tree Changelogs entirely? The scm |
| 4 |
>> logs already document this information, so why have it in a file? |
| 5 |
> The major concern with this is users that are NOT connected to the |
| 6 |
> internet always. |
| 7 |
> If you are connected, you can just use --exclude Changelog in your rsync |
| 8 |
> options. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
That's a good point. But can't we generate the ChangeLogs automatically |
| 12 |
from git on the main rsync server? |
Archives