| 1 |
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:58:52 +0100 |
| 2 |
Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> >> PMS: |
| 6 |
> >> - should be up and running on Gentoo infra by next meeting |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > What is the justification for making this change? It's already |
| 9 |
> > inconvenient enough having to have someone else make bugzilla |
| 10 |
> > changes for me on PMS bugs that I didn't submit; what reason is |
| 11 |
> > there for extending this annoyance to the source too? |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> [16:47] <Kugelfang> vapier: it is already a QA subproject |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> It's not such a big deal in practise is it? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Yes, it is. It's a change in workflow, and it at least doubles the |
| 18 |
amount of work for each commit. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> Unless you're saying you can't use git? Which would be decidedly |
| 21 |
> strange for a kernel contributor.. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I'm saying I don't see any point in it when svn is doing the job just |
| 24 |
fine now. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
If someone can provide a good reason for changing to a system that's |
| 27 |
more work, I'll change. If there isn't a good reason, I won't. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives