From: | Joshua Baergen <joshuabaergen@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Does anyone want|need a static (lib)perl still? | ||
Date: | Wed, 18 Jan 2006 04:07:57 | ||
Message-Id: | 43CDBE34.6010601@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Does anyone want|need a static (lib)perl still? by Michael Cummings |
1 | Michael Cummings wrote: |
2 | > ... |
3 | > |
4 | > |
5 | > |
6 | I'm all for less cruft and more simplicity. As far as I know none of |
7 | the Portage tools depend on Perl, so I don't really find a 'nuclear |
8 | fallout has caused dynamic linking to be erratic' situation to be that |
9 | important. |
10 | |
11 | Joshua Baergen |
12 | -- |
13 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
[gentoo-dev] Re: Does anyone want|need a static (lib)perl still? | Drake Wyrm <wyrm@×××××.com> |