Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: opfer@gentoo.org (Christian Faulhammer)
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: missing metadata.xml
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 08:16:43
Message-Id: A5TZvmn6eKB@v-li.fqdn.th-h.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: missing metadata.xml by Donnie Berkholz
1 Tach Donnie, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
2
3 Donnie Berkholz schrieb:
4 > Christian Faulhammer wrote:
5 >> Steve Dibb schrieb:
6 >>> There are more than a few packages with missing metadata.xml in the
7 >>> portage tree. I've setup my funky little QA website to report on
8 >>> which ones fall in that category, and here is the list right here:
9 >> Nice idea, but you should really add <herd>no-herd</herd> as this is
10 >> required if there is only a "maintainer".
11 > Really? <herd/> isn't valid? I'd rather see that than adding a "fake"
12 > herd.
13
14 I though I read about it being mandatory with "no-herd"...yes Alec Warner
15 wrote that (implicitly). But I am not really sure. At least, herd tag is
16 mandatory, in whatever way.
17
18 V-Li
19
20 --
21 Fingerprint: 68C5 D381 B69A A777 6A91 E999 350A AD7C 2B85 9DE3
22 http://www.gnupg.org/
23 --
24 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: missing metadata.xml Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>