Archives
Archives
| From: | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Cc: | lists@××××××.eu | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] base.eclass | ||
| Date: | Sun, 08 Jul 2012 20:10:54 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20120708221002.7accacb0@pomiocik.lan | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] base.eclass by "René Neumann" |
||
| 1 | On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200 |
| 2 | René Neumann <lists@××××××.eu> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > Hi all, |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of |
| 7 | > base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere, i.e. |
| 8 | > should each eclass make sure it imports and incorporates it. Or is it |
| 9 | > just an eclass like the others and ebuilds should make sure they |
| 10 | > inherit it if needed? |
| 11 | |
| 12 | No. It is unmaintained, has serious design flaws and it simply should |
| 13 | not be used anywhere. At least in EAPI != [01]. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | Best regards, |
| 17 | Michał Górny |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] base.eclass | "René Neumann" <lists@××××××.eu> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] base.eclass | Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] base.eclass | "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] base.eclass | Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> |