1 |
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 4:01 PM, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> This works unless you are talking about packages in @system. |
3 |
> I do see core packages on these arches also languish in ~ for months |
4 |
> with open stable requests. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> The only way to handle one of those would be to remove the old version |
7 |
> and let their deptree break until they catch up. |
8 |
> |
9 |
|
10 |
In terms of direct impact, I agree. Though, I think the hope would be |
11 |
that if enough non-@system packages get pruned they would have more |
12 |
time for the @system ones. |
13 |
|
14 |
The concept of a deptree also breaks down with @system since we tend |
15 |
to not specify these dependencies explicitly. |
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
Rich |