| 1 |
On 10-09-2012 09:32:23 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> So really we should just not support prefix at all in any EAPI before |
| 3 |
> 5, and not have the whole "but define those prefix variables anyway" |
| 4 |
> hack in eclasses. But apparently people are preferring to go to great |
| 5 |
> lengths not to have to use newer EAPIs... |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I think the problem is that this vision doesn't really give a migration |
| 8 |
path, even when people are willing to move on to EAPI 5. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Personally, this vision doesn't really encourage me to push any changes |
| 11 |
for this, since Portage seems to handle it well. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 16 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives