Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Roy Marples <roy@×××××××.name>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?)
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 06:22:19
Message-Id: 200805310722.16268.roy@marples.name
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Saturday 31 May 2008 00:16:31 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > > Ok, then everything in the tree is covered and we can move to having
3 > > --as-needed as default.
4 >
5 > Is the next version of everything in the tree covered? Have you made
6 > sure that software isn't merely working by fluke?
7
8 We interupt this thread with breaking news!
9 A troll claims that future software packages may break!
10 This reporter sure hopes that the developers in question actually tests
11 packages before they commit.
12 I, for one, welcome our new --as-needed Overlords.
13
14 > Is Gentoo really that desperate to turn everyone into a ricer?
15
16 Everyones ride should be pimped.
17
18 Thanks
19
20 Roy
21 --
22 gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list