1 |
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:10 AM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On 08/21/2015 08:50 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
3 |
>>>>>>> On Fri, 21 Aug 2015, hasufell wrote: |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>>> Like allowing that devs may or may not use games.eclass, so that |
6 |
>>> users cannot expect consistent behavior for games anymore? |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> Sorry, but that is not accurate. Usage of games.eclass has been |
9 |
>> deprecated by QA [1] (with the council's mandate [2]), so devs should |
10 |
>> not use it any longer. |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> Maybe QA should be stricter in enforcing its policies, in order to |
13 |
>> avoid such false impressions in future? |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> Ulrich |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> [1] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Quality_Assurance/Meeting_Summaries#Games_team_policies_issue |
18 |
>> [2] https://projects.gentoo.org/council/meeting-logs/20140812-summary.txt |
19 |
>> |
20 |
> |
21 |
> |
22 |
> May I remind you that |
23 |
> |
24 |
> """ |
25 |
> - Motion: "The council encourages the games team to accept join |
26 |
> requests and elect a lead. In the event they don't elect a lead |
27 |
> within 6 weeks, we will consider the team as dysfunctional and thus |
28 |
> disband it." |
29 |
> Accepted with 6 yes votes and 1 abstention. |
30 |
> """ |
31 |
> |
32 |
> has never happened? There has been no vote, but the team has not been |
33 |
> considered dysfunctional. Instead we are just acting like it doesn't |
34 |
> exist, more or less. Sounds good? |
35 |
|
36 |
Well, we did say we would disband it. We just didn't follow through. |
37 |
Would you be happier if we did disband it? |
38 |
|
39 |
The goal was to try to leave the structure there in case anybody steps |
40 |
up, but I don't really see the harm in acting as if the team doesn't |
41 |
exist. It essentially doesn't. Disbanding it would just make it |
42 |
formal. |
43 |
|
44 |
Sure, we did drop this, but I don't really see this line of argument |
45 |
actually accomplishing anything productive. Creating a games team |
46 |
that fixes these issues would be productive. Letting others fix them |
47 |
is also productive. Nobody is opposed to having a games project - it |
48 |
just seems like nobody cares enough to actually make it happen. |
49 |
That's ok - we can still get things done. |
50 |
|
51 |
-- |
52 |
Rich |